| | | | | | |

Core i5-6500 vs i7-4710HQ


Description
The i5-6500 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6500 gets a score of 179.4 k points while the i7-4710HQ gets 155.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6500 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
65 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
53.7k points
40.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
179.44k points
155.24k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6500
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
20.98k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
19.87k
10.48k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.58k
4.75k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.36k
4.44k (x0.7)
TOTAL
53.7k
40.65k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-6500

i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
84.36k
77.73k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
72.91k
52.12k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.08k
20.55k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.1k
4.85k (x0.8)
TOTAL
179.44k
155.24k (x0.87)

Performance/W
i5-6500
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1298 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1122 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
247 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
2761 points/W
3303 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6500
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6359 points/GHz
5994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5521 points/GHz
2993 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1271 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1766 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
TOTAL
14917 points/GHz
11614 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4