| | | | | | |

Core i5-6500 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i5-6500 is based on Skylake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6500 gets a score of 179.4 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-6500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
800f82
Core
Skylake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.7k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
179.44k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-6500
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
3.41k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
14.61k
15.96k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
4.69k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.99k
17.42k (x2.49)
TOTAL
29.71k
41.47k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-6500

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
20.88k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
51.13k
110.37k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.41k
39.25k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
6.66k (x1.71)
TOTAL
84.96k
177.16k (x2.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6500
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
13.76k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.87k
23.03k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.58k
5.12k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.36k
15.23k (x2.39)
TOTAL
53.7k
57.13k (x1.06)

Multithread

i5-6500

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
84.36k
83.23k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
72.91k
161.06k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.08k
40.52k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.1k
6.73k (x1.1)
TOTAL
179.44k
291.53k (x1.62)

Performance/W
i5-6500
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1298 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1122 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
247 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
2761 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6500
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6359 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5521 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1271 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1766 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
14917 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4