| | | | | | |

Core i5-6500 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i5-6500 is based on Skylake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6500 gets a score of 85 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6500 is 1.5 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
100fa0
Core
Skylake-S
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
53.7k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
179.44k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-6500
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
1.98k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
14.61k
4.57k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
2.57k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.99k
3.51k (x0.5)
TOTAL
29.71k
12.64k (x0.43)

Multithread

i5-6500

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
11.86k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
51.13k
27.4k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.41k
15.39k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.46k (x0.89)
TOTAL
84.96k
58.11k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i5-6500
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
787 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
268 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
1307 points/W
612 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6500
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
960 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4057 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1942 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
8253 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4