Core i5-6400 vs i5-10500
Description
The i5-6400 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 174.1 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 174.1 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0653
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.05k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.05k points
387.99k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.2k
4.52k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
12.81k
18.52k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.18k
5.58k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
14.2k (x3.3)
TOTAL
24.49k
42.82k (x1.75)
Multithread
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.45k
25.26k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
46.67k
120.48k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.69k
38.12k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
7.68k (x1.3)
TOTAL
78.73k
191.54k (x2.43)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.56k
16.3k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
16.53k
23.22k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.3k
6.22k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
14.05k (x3.54)
TOTAL
36.36k
59.79k (x1.64)
Multithread
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
92.61k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
64.46k
147.68k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.14k
40.71k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.91k
7.78k (x1.32)
TOTAL
129.51k
288.77k (x2.23)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.82k
16.33k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
24.73k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
5.99k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.95k
13.64k (x2.76)
TOTAL
39.56k
60.69k (x1.53)
Multithread
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
46.04k
91.64k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
69.47k
158.71k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.33k
39.84k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
7.76k (x1)
TOTAL
139.58k
297.94k (x2.13)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.1k
28.73k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
18.28k
26.01k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
6.08k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
14.46k (x3.25)
TOTAL
48.05k
75.27k (x1.57)
Multithread
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
80.03k
172.66k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
167.57k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.19k
39.45k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
8.31k (x1.23)
TOTAL
174.05k
387.99k (x2.23)
Performance/W
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
1231 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1094 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
2678 points/W
5969 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6400
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
6394 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5539 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1348 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
14560 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4