| | | | | | |

Core i5-6400 vs Celeron N5095


Description
The i5-6400 is based on Skylake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 129.5 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 1.4 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
906c0
Core
Skylake-S
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.05k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.05k points
93.26k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-6400
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
11.56k
10.08k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
16.53k
10.11k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.3k
4.06k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
2.36k (x0.59)
TOTAL
36.36k
26.6k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-6400

N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
36.86k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
64.46k
38.51k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.14k
15.17k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.91k
2.72k (x0.46)
TOTAL
129.51k
93.26k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i5-6400
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
662 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
992 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
248 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
1992 points/W
6217 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6400
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5009 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1203 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
11018 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4