| | | | | | |

Core i5-6400 vs Ryzen 5 3550H


Description
The i5-6400 is based on Skylake architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 174.1 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3550H is 1 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.05k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.05k points
178.26k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-6400
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.2k
3.63k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
12.81k
16.69k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.18k
4.92k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
5k (x1.16)
TOTAL
24.49k
30.24k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-6400

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.45k
13.62k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
46.67k
65.71k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.69k
23.7k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
5.64k (x0.95)
TOTAL
78.73k
108.67k (x1.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6400
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.1k
13.51k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
18.28k
22.34k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.98k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
4.24k (x0.95)
TOTAL
48.05k
45.07k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-6400

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
80.03k
52.21k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
95.66k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.19k
25.54k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
4.85k (x0.72)
TOTAL
174.05k
178.26k (x1.02)

Performance/W
i5-6400
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
1231 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1094 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
2678 points/W
5093 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6400
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
6394 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5539 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1348 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
14560 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4