| | | | | | |

Core i5-6300HQ vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
Both models i5-6300HQ and 4110 are based on Skylake architecture.

Sky Lake is also known as 6th generation Core. Include Thunderbolt 3.0, SATA Express and Iris Pro graphics with DirectX 12. It uses LGA 1151 socket for mainstream models and LGA 2066 for X-Series. Sky Lake comes with AVX2 support in all mainstreams CPUs and AVX-512 in some high end models.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
50654
Core
Skylake-H
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2015
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
281.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
18.78k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
16.25k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
3.99k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
6.8k (x1.78)
TOTAL
40.99k
45.82k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-6300HQ

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
133.55k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
108.43k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
30.02k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
9.48k (x2.21)
TOTAL
135.14k
281.48k (x2.08)

Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4