| | | | | | |

Core i5-6300HQ vs i5-5200U


Description
The i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6300HQ is 2 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306d4
Core
Skylake-H
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
68.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
13.58k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
12.14k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
3.18k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.92k (x0.76)
TOTAL
40.99k
31.81k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-6300HQ

i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
28.89k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
28.74k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
7.31k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
3.74k (x0.87)
TOTAL
135.14k
68.69k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
4579 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4