| | | | | | |

Core i5-6300HQ vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
142.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
25.53k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
19.99k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
9.31k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
10.81k (x2.83)
TOTAL
40.99k
65.64k (x1.6)

Multithread

i5-6300HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
58.46k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
57.31k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
20.1k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
6.81k (x1.59)
TOTAL
135.14k
142.69k (x1.06)

Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4