| | | | | | |

Core i5-6300HQ vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
21.5k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
17.71k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
7.92k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
8.24k (x2.15)
TOTAL
40.99k
55.37k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-6300HQ

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
73.03k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
68.19k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
24.89k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
5.54k (x1.29)
TOTAL
135.14k
171.65k (x1.27)

Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4