Core i5-6300HQ vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
14.58k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
23.98k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
5.35k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
6.34k (x1.66)
TOTAL
40.99k
50.25k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-6300HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
57.37k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
107.03k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
28.9k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
7.05k (x1.64)
TOTAL
135.14k
200.34k (x1.48)
Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4