| | | | | | |

Core i5-6300HQ vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
806c1
Core
Skylake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
137.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
24.25k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
21.63k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
9.09k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
7.23k (x1.89)
TOTAL
40.99k
62.19k (x1.52)

Multithread

i5-6300HQ

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
56.9k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
55.68k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
19.29k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
6.09k (x1.42)
TOTAL
135.14k
137.96k (x1.02)

Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4