Core i5-6200U vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-6200U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.6 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.6 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306f2
Core
Skylake-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
38.87k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.18k points
452.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6200U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.06k
18.62k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
15.24k
10.49k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
4.04k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
3.26k (x1.01)
TOTAL
38.87k
36.41k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-6200U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
35.68k
236.25k (x6.62)
Test#2 (FP)
33.68k
151.05k (x4.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
58.9k (x7.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
6.7k (x1.64)
TOTAL
81.18k
452.9k (x5.58)
Performance/W
i5-6200U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2378 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2245 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
272 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5412 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6200U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6091 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5445 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
13882 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4