Core i5-6200U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i5-6200U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
406f1
Core
Skylake-U
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.87k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.18k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6200U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.06k
12.16k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
15.24k
11.82k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
3.02k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
2.4k (x0.74)
TOTAL
38.87k
29.39k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-6200U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
35.68k
103.77k (x2.91)
Test#2 (FP)
33.68k
102.28k (x3.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
26.13k (x3.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
5.65k (x1.38)
TOTAL
81.18k
237.83k (x2.93)
Performance/W
i5-6200U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2378 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2245 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
272 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
5412 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6200U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6091 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5445 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
13882 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4