Core i5-6200U vs i9-9880H
Description
The i5-6200U is based on Skylake architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 4.7 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 4.7 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
906ed
Core
Skylake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16386 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.87k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.18k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6200U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.06k
27.81k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
15.24k
25.88k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
5.65k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
14.19k (x4.41)
TOTAL
38.87k
73.53k (x1.89)
Multithread
i5-6200U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.68k
175.69k (x4.92)
Test#2 (FP)
33.68k
166.56k (x4.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
35.04k (x4.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
4.23k (x1.04)
TOTAL
81.18k
381.53k (x4.7)
Performance/W
i5-6200U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
2378 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2245 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
272 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
5412 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6200U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
6091 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5445 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
13882 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4