| | | | | | |

Core i5-6200U vs i7-7700HQ


Description
The i5-6200U is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 2.6 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
906e9
Core
Skylake-U
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
38.87k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.18k points
208.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6200U
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
17.06k
23.27k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
15.24k
20.35k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
4.76k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
7.92k (x2.46)
TOTAL
38.87k
56.29k (x1.45)

Multithread

i5-6200U

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
35.68k
93.11k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
33.68k
89.03k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
21.29k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
4.9k (x1.2)
TOTAL
81.18k
208.33k (x2.57)

Performance/W
i5-6200U
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2378 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2245 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
272 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
5412 points/W
4629 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6200U
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6091 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5445 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
13882 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4