| | | | | | |

Core i5-6200U vs i7-7560U


Description
The i5-6200U is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7560U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
806e9
Core
Skylake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
38.87k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.18k points
97.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6200U
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.06k
19.37k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
15.24k
17.26k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
3.78k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
7.75k (x2.41)
TOTAL
38.87k
48.16k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-6200U

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
35.68k
39.17k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
33.68k
38.24k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
8.9k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
10.97k (x2.68)
TOTAL
81.18k
97.27k (x1.2)

Performance/W
i5-6200U
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2378 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2245 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
272 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
5412 points/W
6485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6200U
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
6091 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5445 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
13882 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4