Core i5-6200U vs i3-7100U
Description
The i5-6200U is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6200U is 1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6200U is 1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
806e9
Core
Skylake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.87k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.18k points
79.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.06k
13.46k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
15.24k
13.45k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
3.08k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
3.4k (x1.05)
TOTAL
38.87k
33.38k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-6200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
35.68k
34.95k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
33.68k
33.53k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
7.74k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.38k (x0.83)
TOTAL
81.18k
79.6k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i5-6200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2378 points/W
2330 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2245 points/W
2235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
272 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
5412 points/W
5307 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6200U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
6091 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5445 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
1415 points/GHz
TOTAL
13882 points/GHz
13909 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4