Core i5-6200U vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i5-6200U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 8.5 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6200U gets a score of 81.2 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 8.5 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
870f10
Core
Skylake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.87k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.18k points
687.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6200U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
17.06k
16.85k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.24k
26.03k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
9.54k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
22.55k (x7)
TOTAL
38.87k
74.97k (x1.93)
Multithread
i5-6200U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
35.68k
229.41k (x6.43)
Test#2 (FP)
33.68k
292.81k (x8.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
128.48k (x16.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
36.8k (x9.01)
TOTAL
81.18k
687.5k (x8.47)
Performance/W
i5-6200U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
2378 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2245 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
272 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
5412 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6200U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6091 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5445 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
13882 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4