Core i5-5675R vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 156.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 156.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
206d7
Core
Bradwell-H
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
8 /16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2015
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
8.76k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
7.35k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
3.86k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
3.32k (x0.61)
TOTAL
41.72k
23.28k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-5675R
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
78.51k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
66.46k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
36.42k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
3.88k (x0.23)
TOTAL
156.83k
185.26k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
768 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1082 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
260 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
2413 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3578 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1422 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1514 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
11589 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4