Core i5-5675R vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
Both models i5-5675R and E5-2620 v4 are based on Broadwell architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
406f1
Core
Bradwell-H
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
2.6k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
7.55k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
2.61k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
2.03k (x0.37)
TOTAL
28.91k
14.79k (x0.51)
Multithread
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
17.41k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
75.46k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
26.25k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
4.65k (x0.28)
TOTAL
106.18k
123.78k (x1.17)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
8.22k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
12.06k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
4.01k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
2.89k (x0.53)
TOTAL
40.39k
27.18k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
61.34k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
90.21k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
26.2k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
4.62k (x0.27)
TOTAL
151.6k
182.37k (x1.2)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
6.04k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
10.18k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
2.74k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
2.41k (x0.44)
TOTAL
41.72k
21.37k (x0.51)
Multithread
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
47.51k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
75.12k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
19.72k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
5.45k (x0.32)
TOTAL
156.83k
147.8k (x0.94)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
12.16k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
11.82k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
3.02k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
2.4k (x0.42)
TOTAL
51.43k
29.39k (x0.57)
Multithread
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
103.77k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
102.28k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
26.13k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
5.65k (x0.33)
TOTAL
194.2k
237.83k (x1.22)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4