| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs Xeon E5-1660 v4


Description
Both models i5-5675R and E5-1660 v4 are based on Broadwell architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 156.8 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 2 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
406f1
Core
Bradwell-H
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2015
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
320.49k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
12.41k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
17.23k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.89k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
3.07k (x0.56)
TOTAL
41.72k
37.6k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-5675R

E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
102.11k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
156.5k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
42.08k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
19.8k (x1.17)
TOTAL
156.83k
320.49k (x2.04)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
768 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1082 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
260 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
2413 points/W
2289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3578 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1422 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1514 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
11589 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4