| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
50657
Core
Bradwell-H
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2015
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
1.97k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
8.15k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
2.37k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
4.84k (x0.88)
TOTAL
28.91k
17.32k (x0.6)

Multithread

i5-5675R

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
15.73k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
64.78k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
18.06k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
5.21k (x0.31)
TOTAL
106.18k
103.77k (x0.98)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
12.92k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
10.97k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
2.54k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
5.09k (x0.89)
TOTAL
51.43k
31.52k (x0.61)

Multithread

i5-5675R

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
103.33k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
87.67k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
20.1k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
4.91k (x0.29)
TOTAL
194.2k
216.02k (x1.11)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4