Core i5-5675R vs i9-10980XE
Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.4 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.4 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
50657
Core
Bradwell-H
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/4
18/36
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
June 2015
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.52k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
17.94k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.5k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
9.64k (x1.76)
TOTAL
28.91k
37.6k (x1.3)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
84.93k (x5.3)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
409.55k (x7.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
122.88k (x6.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
22.12k (x1.31)
TOTAL
106.18k
639.48k (x6.02)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
16.03k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
23.95k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
6.03k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
9.37k (x1.71)
TOTAL
40.39k
55.38k (x1.37)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
316.11k (x6.31)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
503.75k (x7.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
131.82k (x6.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
22.24k (x1.3)
TOTAL
151.6k
973.92k (x6.42)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
16.4k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
20.97k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.82k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
8.86k (x1.63)
TOTAL
41.72k
52.05k (x1.25)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
316.84k (x6.35)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
461.09k (x6.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
129.82k (x6.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
22.09k (x1.31)
TOTAL
156.83k
929.85k (x5.93)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
29.53k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
22.59k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.99k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
10.22k (x1.79)
TOTAL
51.43k
68.33k (x1.33)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
587.06k (x6.91)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
496.41k (x6.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
134.66k (x6.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
22.99k (x1.35)
TOTAL
194.2k
1241.12k (x6.39)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4