| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i7-9750H


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
906ed
Core
Bradwell-H
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2015
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.53k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
18.24k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.76k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
13.01k (x2.38)
TOTAL
28.91k
41.54k (x1.44)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
24.3k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
97.88k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
29.85k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
11.93k (x0.71)
TOTAL
106.18k
163.95k (x1.54)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
16.32k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
23.42k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
6.04k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
13.24k (x2.41)
TOTAL
40.39k
59.03k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
86.92k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
126.14k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
29.62k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
11.86k (x0.69)
TOTAL
151.6k
254.54k (x1.68)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
16.31k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
24.48k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.87k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
13.02k (x2.39)
TOTAL
41.72k
59.67k (x1.43)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
87.54k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
131.05k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
28.47k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
11.8k (x0.7)
TOTAL
156.83k
258.87k (x1.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
25.22k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
21.97k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.02k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
10.71k (x1.87)
TOTAL
51.43k
62.92k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
125.56k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
115.86k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
25.63k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
9.4k (x0.55)
TOTAL
194.2k
276.46k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4