| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i5-9300H


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i5-9300H gets 244.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
906ea
Core
Bradwell-H
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2015
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
3.38k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
12.84k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.6k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
6.23k (x1.14)
TOTAL
28.91k
27.05k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
11.6k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
48.01k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
17.05k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
3.88k (x0.23)
TOTAL
106.18k
80.54k (x0.76)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
26.62k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
23.38k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.52k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
12.05k (x2.11)
TOTAL
51.43k
67.57k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
107.95k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
104.02k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
24.4k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
7.74k (x0.45)
TOTAL
194.2k
244.1k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2312 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
542 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
5424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
6493 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5703 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
2938 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
16480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4