| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i5-7400


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
906e9
Core
Bradwell-H
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2015
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
173.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
12.72k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
19.3k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.76k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
8.73k (x1.6)
TOTAL
41.72k
45.52k (x1.09)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
47.95k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
71.98k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
17.22k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
8.03k (x0.47)
TOTAL
156.83k
145.18k (x0.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
22.37k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
19.46k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
4.44k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
6.41k (x1.12)
TOTAL
51.43k
52.69k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
79.57k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
71.41k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
16.44k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
6.27k (x0.37)
TOTAL
194.2k
173.7k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
2672 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4