| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.9 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
a0653
Core
Bradwell-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.3k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
16.56k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.25k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
12.61k (x2.3)
TOTAL
28.91k
38.72k (x1.34)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
18.1k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
79.16k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
26.75k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
13.81k (x0.82)
TOTAL
106.18k
137.82k (x1.3)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
26.28k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
23.38k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.52k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
12.96k (x2.26)
TOTAL
51.43k
68.14k (x1.32)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
163.67k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
159.74k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
39k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
7.56k (x0.44)
TOTAL
194.2k
369.97k (x1.91)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4