| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i3-10105


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
a0653
Core
Bradwell-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2015
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
253.93k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.5k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
18.39k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.78k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
8.3k (x1.52)
TOTAL
28.91k
36.97k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
16.13k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
75.62k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
27.88k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
3.57k (x0.21)
TOTAL
106.18k
123.2k (x1.16)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
16.19k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
23.07k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
6.04k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
8.46k (x1.54)
TOTAL
40.39k
53.77k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
57.59k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
100.63k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
28.59k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
3.56k (x0.21)
TOTAL
151.6k
190.38k (x1.26)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
16.11k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
24.12k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.71k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
7.89k (x1.45)
TOTAL
41.72k
53.83k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
58.25k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
105.73k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
27.8k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
3.51k (x0.21)
TOTAL
156.83k
195.29k (x1.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
28.9k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
25.85k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.88k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
8.29k (x1.45)
TOTAL
51.43k
68.92k (x1.34)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
111.69k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
110.23k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
28.45k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
3.56k (x0.21)
TOTAL
194.2k
253.93k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4