| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i3-10100T


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
a0653
Core
Bradwell-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.32k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
15.7k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.04k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
7.68k (x1.4)
TOTAL
28.91k
32.73k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
16.59k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
71.1k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
23.26k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
3.86k (x0.23)
TOTAL
106.18k
114.81k (x1.08)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
13.84k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
19.79k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.28k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
8.31k (x1.51)
TOTAL
40.39k
47.22k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
54.67k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
90.71k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
24.11k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
3.85k (x0.23)
TOTAL
151.6k
173.34k (x1.14)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
13.88k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
20.94k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.18k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
8.2k (x1.5)
TOTAL
41.72k
48.19k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
54.88k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
93.17k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
23.34k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
3.85k (x0.23)
TOTAL
156.83k
175.24k (x1.12)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
24.31k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
22.15k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.14k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
8.46k (x1.48)
TOTAL
51.43k
60.06k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
101.48k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
98.04k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
24.28k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
3.86k (x0.23)
TOTAL
194.2k
227.67k (x1.17)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4