| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs Ryzen 5 3400G


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3400G is 1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
810f81
Core
Bradwell-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
200.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
14.58k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
23.98k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.35k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
6.34k (x1.11)
TOTAL
51.43k
50.25k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-5675R

3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
57.37k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
107.03k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
28.9k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
7.05k (x0.41)
TOTAL
194.2k
200.34k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
3082 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4