| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
800f11
Core
Bradwell-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2015
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
3.95k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
18.36k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.39k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
17.35k (x3.17)
TOTAL
28.91k
45.06k (x1.56)

Multithread

i5-5675R

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
19.47k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
77.19k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
15.4k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
12.25k (x0.73)
TOTAL
106.18k
124.3k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
14.63k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
24.09k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.51k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
15.86k (x2.77)
TOTAL
51.43k
60.09k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-5675R

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
48.75k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
80.1k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
24.5k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
19.85k (x1.16)
TOTAL
194.2k
173.2k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4