Core i5-5675R vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
810f81
Core
Bradwell-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2015
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
13.25k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
21.67k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
4.79k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
3.98k (x0.7)
TOTAL
51.43k
43.7k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-5675R
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
46.47k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
78.38k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
16.69k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
3.3k (x0.19)
TOTAL
194.2k
144.84k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4