| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs Ryzen 3 1200


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.6 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
800f11
Core
Bradwell-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2015
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
117.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
11.73k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
18.85k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
4.22k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
2.76k (x0.48)
TOTAL
51.43k
37.55k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-5675R

1200
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
38.56k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
62.21k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
13.7k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
3.33k (x0.2)
TOTAL
194.2k
117.81k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
1812 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4