| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs A12 9800


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.9 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
660f51
Core
Bradwell-H
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
June 2015
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
100.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
13.42k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
17.61k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
3.77k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
3.06k (x0.53)
TOTAL
51.43k
37.86k (x0.74)

Multithread

i5-5675R

9800
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
40.46k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
43.18k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
12.78k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
4.37k (x0.26)
TOTAL
194.2k
100.79k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
1551 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4