Core i5-5675R vs i5-12400F
Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
90675
Core
Bradwell-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
June 2015
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
7.43k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
18.64k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
13.15k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
14.82k (x2.71)
TOTAL
28.91k
54.04k (x1.87)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
36.23k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
134.76k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
84.06k (x4.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
16.71k (x0.99)
TOTAL
106.18k
271.76k (x2.56)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
24.18k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
23.85k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
14.42k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
14.87k (x2.71)
TOTAL
40.39k
77.32k (x1.91)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
122.98k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
168.77k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
96.11k (x4.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
16.32k (x0.96)
TOTAL
151.6k
404.19k (x2.67)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
24.24k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
24.74k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
13.95k (x2.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
14.47k (x2.66)
TOTAL
41.72k
77.41k (x1.86)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
126.87k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
186.48k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
92.37k (x4.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
15.45k (x0.91)
TOTAL
156.83k
421.18k (x2.69)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
33.85k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
20.33k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
10.51k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
11.77k (x2.06)
TOTAL
51.43k
76.46k (x1.49)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
174.21k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
141.31k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
64.86k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
19.01k (x1.11)
TOTAL
194.2k
399.39k (x2.06)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4