Core i5-5675R vs i3-12100F
Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.8 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.8 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
90675
Core
Bradwell-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2015
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
340.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
39.54k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
23.79k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
11.96k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
13.52k (x2.36)
TOTAL
51.43k
88.81k (x1.73)
Multithread
i5-5675R
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
148k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
123.08k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
52.73k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
16.67k (x0.98)
TOTAL
194.2k
340.49k (x1.75)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
5871 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4