| | | | | | |

Core i5-5300U vs i3-8130U


Description
The i5-5300U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
806ea
Core
Broadwell-U
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.71k points
88.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5300U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.2k
21.09k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
14.53k
19.41k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
4.05k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
2.8k (x0.9)
TOTAL
38.29k
47.35k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-5300U

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.7k
38.23k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
38.89k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
8.75k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
2.47k (x0.69)
TOTAL
76.71k
88.35k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i5-5300U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2346 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
5114 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5300U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5931 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5011 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1186 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1076 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
13204 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4