| | | | | | |

Core i5-5300U vs i3-7130U


Description
The i5-5300U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
806e9
Core
Broadwell-U
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.71k points
90.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5300U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.2k
17.82k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
14.53k
16.18k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
3.76k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
4.24k (x1.36)
TOTAL
38.29k
42k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-5300U

i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.7k
40.25k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
37.4k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
9.07k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
4.17k (x1.17)
TOTAL
76.71k
90.89k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i5-5300U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
2683 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2346 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
5114 points/W
6059 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5300U
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5931 points/GHz
6600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5011 points/GHz
5992 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1186 points/GHz
1391 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1076 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
TOTAL
13204 points/GHz
15554 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4