Core i5-5300U vs i3-10105
Description
The i5-5300U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3.3 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3.3 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
a0653
Core
Broadwell-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.71k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5300U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
17.2k
28.9k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
14.53k
25.85k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
5.88k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
8.29k (x2.66)
TOTAL
38.29k
68.92k (x1.8)
Multithread
i5-5300U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
28.7k
111.69k (x3.89)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
110.23k (x3.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
28.45k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.56k (x1)
TOTAL
76.71k
253.93k (x3.31)
Performance/W
i5-5300U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2346 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5114 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5300U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
5931 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5011 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1186 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1076 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
13204 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4