Core i5-5300U vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i5-5300U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 6.6 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 6.6 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
870f10
Core
Broadwell-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
March 2015
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.71k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5300U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
17.2k
17.57k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
14.53k
27.38k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
9.35k (x2.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
23.9k (x7.66)
TOTAL
38.29k
78.2k (x2.04)
Multithread
i5-5300U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
28.7k
176.08k (x6.13)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
219.88k (x6.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
100k (x10.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
12.93k (x3.62)
TOTAL
76.71k
508.89k (x6.63)
Performance/W
i5-5300U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2346 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
5114 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5300U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
5931 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5011 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1186 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1076 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
13204 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4