Core i5-5300U vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The i5-5300U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5300U is 1.5 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5300U is 1.5 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
820f01
Core
Broadwell-U
Dali
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.71k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5300U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
17.2k
9.28k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
14.53k
14.56k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
3.44k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
2.06k (x0.66)
TOTAL
38.29k
29.34k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-5300U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
28.7k
15.75k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
28.63k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
5.87k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
2.17k (x0.61)
TOTAL
76.71k
52.42k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i5-5300U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2346 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
5114 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5300U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
5931 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5011 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1186 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1076 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
13204 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4