| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Pentium E5500


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.6 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
1067a
Core
Broadwell-U
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
20.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
2.56k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
6.54k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
2.76k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
0.91k (x0.35)
TOTAL
17.76k
12.77k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-5200U

E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
4.32k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
10.8k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
4.7k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
0.87k (x0.29)
TOTAL
32.61k
20.69k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
277 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1268 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
432 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
2174 points/W
318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3469 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1160 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
961 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
6577 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4