Core i5-5200U vs Xeon X3430
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the X3430 gets 35.5 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the X3430 gets 35.5 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
106e5
Core
Broadwell-U
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2015
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
55.66k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
1.75k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
3.95k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
2.29k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.66k (x1.02)
TOTAL
17.76k
10.65k (x0.6)
Multithread
i5-5200U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
6.81k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
15.37k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
8.9k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
4.42k (x1.49)
TOTAL
32.61k
35.49k (x1.09)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
277 points/W
72 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1268 points/W
162 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
432 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
2174 points/W
374 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
623 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3469 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1160 points/GHz
820 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
961 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
TOTAL
6577 points/GHz
3802 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4