| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
306e4
Core
Broadwell-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2 /4
12 /24
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
3.44k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
9.54k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
4.21k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
3.94k (x1.52)
TOTAL
17.76k
21.13k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-5200U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
73.17k (x17.58)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
230.83k (x12.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
107.14k (x16.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
7.99k (x2.7)
TOTAL
32.61k
419.12k (x12.85)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
10.53k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
9.98k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
4k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.4k (x1.22)
TOTAL
26.62k
27.92k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-5200U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
247.05k (x16.26)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
264.43k (x10.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
111.01k (x16.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
10.66k (x3.6)
TOTAL
50.85k
633.14k (x12.45)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1013 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1733 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
3390 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3140 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
9860 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4