| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5-2690 0


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.6 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
206d7
Core
Broadwell-U
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8 /16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
185.26k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
8.76k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
7.35k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
3.86k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.32k (x1.19)
TOTAL
26.62k
23.28k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-5200U

E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
78.51k (x5.17)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
66.46k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
36.42k (x5.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
3.88k (x1.31)
TOTAL
50.85k
185.26k (x3.64)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
1013 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1733 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
3390 points/W
1372 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3140 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
9860 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4