| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Pentium T3400


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the T3400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the T3400 gets 13 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 2.5 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
6fd
Core
Broadwell-U
Merom-2M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
March 2015
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
14.91k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
1.86k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
1.9k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
1.42k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
0.84k (x0.32)
TOTAL
17.76k
6.01k (x0.34)

Multithread

i5-5200U

T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
4.04k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
4.17k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
3.55k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
1.2k (x0.41)
TOTAL
32.61k
12.96k (x0.4)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
277 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1268 points/W
119 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
432 points/W
101 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
34 points/W
TOTAL
2174 points/W
370 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3469 points/GHz
875 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1160 points/GHz
654 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
961 points/GHz
385 points/GHz
TOTAL
6577 points/GHz
2773 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4