Core i5-5200U vs Core 2 Duo E7400
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the E7400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the E7400 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.3 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 32.6 k points while the E7400 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.3 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
1067a
Core
Broadwell-U
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
14.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
25.71k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
2.54k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
6.56k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
2.73k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
1.83k (x0.71)
TOTAL
17.76k
13.66k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-5200U
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
5.08k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
13.07k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
5.52k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
1.62k (x0.55)
TOTAL
32.61k
25.29k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
277 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1268 points/W
201 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
432 points/W
85 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
2174 points/W
389 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
906 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3469 points/GHz
2344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1160 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
961 points/GHz
654 points/GHz
TOTAL
6577 points/GHz
4879 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4