| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs i5-6300HQ


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the i5-6300HQ gets 135.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6300HQ is 2 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
506e3
Core
Broadwell-U
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
40.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
135.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
17.99k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
15.61k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
3.56k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
3.83k (x1.31)
TOTAL
31.81k
40.99k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-5200U

i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
64.95k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
54.01k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
11.9k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
4.29k (x1.15)
TOTAL
68.69k
135.14k (x1.97)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1443 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
264 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
3003 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
4878 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1113 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
12808 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4