| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs i5-3320M


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
306a9
Core
Broadwell-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
58.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
3.21k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
9.05k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
3.94k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
3.93k (x1.52)
TOTAL
17.76k
20.13k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-5200U

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
6.08k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
19.02k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
8.85k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
3.98k (x1.34)
TOTAL
32.61k
37.93k (x1.16)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
10.64k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
10.53k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
4.07k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.97k (x1.42)
TOTAL
26.62k
29.22k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-5200U

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
21.27k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
23.93k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
9.48k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
4.12k (x1.39)
TOTAL
50.85k
58.81k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
1013 points/W
608 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1733 points/W
684 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
3390 points/W
1680 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3140 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
9860 points/GHz
8853 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4